Capital gains tax: hidden dangers in planning for Labour’s Budget
Insight shared by:
Article by
It has been widely reported that Chancellor Rachel Reeves may look at increasing the rates and scope of capital gains tax (CGT) in the first Budget of the new Parliament on 30 October 2024. This has, in turn, prompted much speculation on both the nature of the incoming changes and the timing of when they will take effect.
Naturally, businesses and investors who are within the charge to CGT (as distinct from corporate tax on capital gains) are considering how these changes might impact them, with one area of focus being on the impact on those holding land as an investment, i.e. as a capital asset.
If it becomes clear that CGT rates will rise to align with income tax rates, landowners within the charge to CGT may wish to reclassify or ‘appropriate’ that land to trading stock before Budget Day. An appropriation to trading stock will trigger a deemed disposal for CGT purposes, thereby allowing unrealised gains to be taxed at CGT rates, which may be beneficial if such rates become aligned with income tax rates.
There are two factors to bear in mind when considering reclassifying investment holdings as trading stock:
-
It’s harder to do than you might think
In the recent case of Stolkin v HMRC, it was confirmed that where land has been bought without the intention to sell it on by a non-developer, merely taking steps to enhance the value of the property in the eyes of a future buyer will not be enough to count as engaging in a trade. Indeed, the initial intention not to trade can make it harder to convince HMRC that the land is now being used in a trade, with Judge Baldwin colourfully noting that: “We appreciate that this means that it may be harder for a person to carry on a trade in relation to an asset acquired other than as trading stock than it is for a person who acquires an asset as trading stock and then does the same as the first person does… But, rather like the blood on Lady Macbeth’s hands, it [the original investment status] will not go away…”. -
The ‘dry’ tax charge
Appropriating land held as an investment into trading stock may also trigger a CGT disposal charged as if the land had been sold for market value at the time of the appropriation. This will trigger a CGT liability if the market value of the land exceeds its base cost. This is described as a ‘dry’ tax charge as the taxpayer is subject to tax by reference to a sum that they have not actually received (i.e. the market value of the property). Persons considering such an appropriation will need to consider whether the benefit of a realised gain being taxed at current CGT rates is outweighed by the need to fund the tax separately.
What can be done?
As shown in the example above, tax planning can be a complex endeavour with the best solution – and usually the most cost effective in the long run – being to engage tax advisers early. They can then take a holistic approach to advising on transactions and structures to ensure potential liabilities and pitfalls are avoided.
Persons within the charge to CGT will need to weigh up all the factors in deciding whether or not to make an appropriation. One obvious point to consider is what would happen if CGT rates actually stay where they are. The appropriation is a one-way bet, but persons within the charge to CGT can elect for their CGT base cost to become, broadly speaking, their acquisition cost for income tax purposes. This can at least prevent the ‘dry’ tax charge described above. If an appropriation occurs in the 24/25 tax year, persons within the charge to CGT would have until 31 January 2027 to make such an election.
Gateley Plc is authorised and regulated by the SRA (Solicitors' Regulation Authority). Please visit the SRA website for details of the professional conduct rules which Gateley Legal must comply with.